Friday, December 21, 2012

Survey: Rising Prices Motivate Buyers to Purchase Now

The expectation for prices to continue rising is creating urgency among consumers to buy now, according to a Redfinsurvey of 1,084 active homebuyers.


The percentage of homebuyers who believe prices are bound to move higher in the next 12 months increased to 71 percent in the fourth quarter from 61 percent in third quarter, according to the survey. The fourth quarter share is also more than double from 34 percent in the first quarter.

More respondents cited rising prices as an incentive to purchase a home now, with 33 percent falling into this category compared to 29 percent in the third quarter and 19 percent in the first quarter.

While rising prices are causing some buyers to purchase now, low inventory is prompting others to hold off on their search.

Thirty-eight percent of respondents say they plan to take a break and wait for more listings. Meanwhile, other buyers are compensating for the lack of listings by expanding their search area, with 46 percent indicating they are expanding into areas not previously considered.

Buyers still cited low interest rates as the leading reason to buy this year, but the share decreased to 57 percent in the fourth quarter from 64 percent in the third quarter.

According to the survey, Americans appear to be less discouraged by the state of the economy. 
Just 22 percent of respondents say a weak economy is a major concern for buying now, a decrease from 27 percent in the third quarter.

As prices rise, the survey also found that during the nine months between the first quarter survey and the fourth quarter survey, the percentage of buyers who were also potential home sellers doubled from 8 percent to 16 percent.

Repeat buyers are also planning to make upgrades with their next purchase. When asked about the planned size of their next home compared to their current home, 49 percent indicated plans to buy a “much bigger” home, which was the most common response. In addition, 41 percent plan to buy a home that is the same size but nicer, more affordable, or in a different location. Redfin says it expects “2013 to be the year of the move-up buyer.”


The Perfect Real Estate Market for First-Time Home Buyers


If you are a first-time home buyer who has been looking for the perfect opportunity to buy a new home, then the time is now. The current real estate market is perfect for everything from buying a new home to investing in the real estate market, which is why first-time home buyers and investors have been going head to head and competing for the best real estate on the market.
Why, exactly, is now a great time for first time home buyers to purchase a new home? From incredible deals on foreclosure and short sales to low interest rates and a projection for rising home prices in the future, now is the perfect real estate market for first-time home buyers.
Short Sales and Bank-Owned Homes
If you are a first-time home buyer looking to buy a new home in the current real estate market then you are more than likely looking for the best deals possible. Fortunately, with the number of foreclosures and short sales on the market, you can find discounted properties that are well below market value, which essentially allows for a lower monthly mortgage payment.
In fact, with the tax break on short sales that allows struggling homeowners to avoid paying federal taxes on their unpaid mortgages set to expire December 31, there are a ton of short sale properties currently on the market. Therefore, if you are in the market to buy your first home then start looking today, especially if you are interested in short sales and other distressed properties.
Plus, with mortgage rates still remaining incredibly low, there is nothing better than for a first-time home buyer to be able to purchase a home below market value and secure an incredibly low mortgage rate. This is the perfect recipe for a low monthly mortgage payment.
Rising Home Prices
Some people may be wondering “Why now?” The simple answer to that question essentially revolves around one thing: home prices. Home prices have already started to rise as the real estate market makes progress toward recovery; however, predictions for 2013 include home prices continuing to increase as the real estate market strengthens. Therefore, if you are looking to buy a new home for a discounted price, then do so now before home prices rise.
In conclusion, with the high number of distressed properties (including short sales and foreclosures) still on the market and low home prices (coupled with low mortgage rates), now is the perfect time for first-time home buyers to obtain a new home for well below market value and secure a lower mortgage payment. So, if you are a first time home buyer, start your search for your dream home today! 
By: John E. Miller

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Home Prices Could Jump 9.7% in 2013, J.P. Morgan Says


Home-price forecasts for 2013 are on the rise.
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. expects U.S. home prices to rise 3.4% in its base-case estimate and up to 9.7% in its most bullish scenario of economic growth. Standard & Poor’s, which rates private-issue mortgage bonds, on Friday said it expects a 5% rise in 2013.
The J.P. Morgan analysts boosted their base-case estimate from 1.5% after a convincing rise in the “net demand” for housing this year has surpassed 2 million homes for the first time since 2006, said John Sim, a strategist at the investment bank. Net demand is the pace of existing home sales minus the inventory of homes available for sale.
“Net demand has picked up a lot in 2012,” said Mr. Sim. “Once you get north of the 2 million territory, you are in the positive growth area unless you get a lot of distressed inventory, which this year hit a low point” since at least 2008, he added. J.P. Morgan predicts that net demand to rise from 2.7 million next year from 2.3 million this year.
An expected increase in home prices in 2012 triggered a run into some of the riskiest real estate assets, such as subprime mortgage-backed securities from the real estate boom, and analysts including Mr. Sim expect that trend to continue. Rising home prices and the quest for yield has also given a tailwind to new mortgage bond issuance that has been mired in the fallout of the housing crisis and regulatory uncertainty for the past four years.
U.S. home prices nationwide increased on a year-over-year basis by 6.3% in October, the biggest increase since June 2006, according to CoreLogic. Investors zoning in on the increases bought subprime mortgage bonds, which have posted returns of more than 40% since December.
Home price increases could exceed J.P. Morgan’s base forecast if investors seeking yield push deeper into real estate, according to Mr. Sim’s home price report.
That may already be happening, considering recent comments by Luke Scolastico, a vice president at Credit Suisse, one of two issuers of mortgage bonds without government backing since the financial crisis. Credit Suisse is increasing its purchases of jumbo loans to meet demand for securities it sees from investors, he said on an American Securitization Forum panel this week.
“We’re buying loans, every day…and (on the month,) more than the month before,” Mr. Scolastico said. Part of the reason is because of home price appreciation, but also because of the “technical demand” for relatively higher yielding assets as Federal Reserve policies depress interest rates, he said.
New mortgage bond sales from other issuers, including investment banks, could boost issuance of private label bonds this year as high as $30 billion, Mr. Sim said. That’s up from almost $5 billion this year but paltry compared with annual volume above $1 trillion generated as the housing bubble neared its breaking point in 2006.
Mortgage bonds issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae still fund more than 90% of new home loans. Bank portfolios and other private lending make up the rest.
Considering risks, J.P. Morgan analysts conceded that the economy is “gloomy” and tight lending standards can stop a bullish homebuyer from proceeding with a purchase. On the supply side, the “shadow inventory” of more than four million homes near or stuck in foreclosure still looms, though that is dropping, the analysts said.
What’s more, just the uncertainty over whether politicians will be able to steer clear of the “fiscal cliff,” the scheduled tax increases and spending cuts next month, may hurt investor confidence, the J.P. Morgan analysts said.
If taxes rise, reduced income for the potential homebuyers will damp housing demand, they added.
But the expectations for higher home prices are still widespread. Nearly three-quarters of investors polled by J.P. Morgan expect home prices to rise 5% in 2013.


Thursday, December 6, 2012

Fannie and Freddie Halt Foreclosures for the Holidays


Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Bank of America said they will not evict homeowners going through foreclosure during the holidays.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Homeowners facing foreclosure just received an early Christmas present: They won't be evicted from their homes over the holidays.

Mortgage giants, Freddie Mac (FMCCFortune 500) and Fannie Mae (FNMA,Fortune 500), announced Monday that they will suspend all bank repossessions beginning December 17 and December 19, respectively, and will not resume the evictions until January 2, 2013.
"The holidays are a chance to be with loved ones and we want to relieve some stress at this time of year," said Terry Edwards, Executive Vice President of Credit Portfolio Management, Fannie Mae.
According to Freddie spokesman, Brad German, the suspension will not affect other pre- or post-foreclosure activities, such as the filing notices of default or the scheduling of auction sales. Fannie said in its press release that other legal and administrative proceedings will also continue.
Bank of America (BACFortune 500) said it will also put a halt to foreclosure evictions both for loans it owns and for those it services for investors during the holiday period. Other large mortgage lenders, including JPMorgan Chase (JPMFortune 500), Wells Fargo (BWF), and Citibank (CFortune 500) have postponed foreclosures during the holidays in the past, but have yet to say whether they will do so again this year.
The reprieve is separate from the previously announced moratoriums on foreclosure evictions for victims of Superstorm Sandy in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, which will continue through February. To top of page

8 Major Indicators All Confirm A Strong Recovery In US Home Prices


Professor Mark Perry of the Carpe Diem blog summarizes the latest numbers from the major home price indices:
There’s a pretty strong consensus among economists and analysts that U.S. home prices bottomed in 2011 and have been gradually rising in 2012 as the housing market entered a new period of recovery this year. The chart above summarizes eight key home price indicators, which are all showing strong, positive increases in home prices (or asking prices) through either September or October on a year-over-year basis.

Santa Barbara Real Estate Market-Still Robust!


The real estate market in the Santa Barbara area is still moving forward.  Comparing this October to last year’s, we had 52% more closed sales of single family residences and planned unit development units (all to be referred to as houses).   Looking at our year-to-date total, we have surpassed the number of sales every year in the past 11 years except 2004, which had just a few more sales than we have this year.

Our condos have also been flying off the shelf.  There were over 64% more sales this October than there were last October.  Overall, the number of condo sales is up about 45% over last year. 

Our year to date median price of $799,000 is basically the same as it was last year.  We are seeing the bulk of our sales occurring under this price, but we are still seeing high-end properties continue to sell.  Last year in October, only six properties closed escrow over $2,000,000 and none over $4,000,000.  This past month, we had eight properties close escrow between $2,000,000 and $4,000,000 and six properties over $4,000,000 which represents more than 13% of the monthly sales.    

The year to date median for condos is $400,000 but this is almost 4% less than last year’s median.   This can partially be attributed to the fact that almost 40% of the condos that sold this year were either short sales or bank owned (also known as “distressed”), and those types of properties tend to be sold a bit less than market value. 

At the beginning of the year, it was easy for first buyers to find affordable properties.  There were quite a few houses under $500,000 back in January; now there are four available, most with two bedrooms and one bath.   It is interesting to see that 15 houses did close escrow this month under $500,000, which shows that they the potential to buy in that range is still possible. 

It is important to note that over 1/3 of the houses sold above their list price.   There are still multiple offer situations in every price range.   Some properties have had more than 10 offers.  I just participated in a multiple offer situation on a well-priced house and there were 16 offers with the assumption that the price went well over the list price.  There is still pent up demand for buying.

The percentage of distressed houses that closed escrow this month was around 28%.  As of this writing, we have a total of 29 distressed houses in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) with 13 of them in escrow.  For condos, the percentage was 39% of the closed escrows were distressed.  Currently, there are a total of 9 distressed condos in the MLS and all of them are in escrow.    It appears that the number of available distressed properties is shrinking in numbers. 

One of our biggest issues is the lack of inventory.  As of this writing, we have 42 houses that are priced under the current median of $799,000.  That represents just 11% of our available inventory of houses.   The median price of the houses in escrow is $815,000.   Once these properties close escrow, we will most probably see an upswing in our median price.  As Table 1 indicates, overall we only have 3.2 months of inventory, which means it would take that long to sell the current inventory.  Note that in the city of Santa Barbara and the area we refer to as Goleta (comprises most of “Noleta” and the city of Goleta) there is less than 2 months of inventory.  Higher end properties usually take longer to sell, but 5.9 months of inventory for Montecito actually represents a balanced market.  The number of sales for both Carp/Summerland and Hope Ranch are statistically too low to have an accurate basis for months of inventory. 

Based on the above information, here is a plea to our financial institutions, “If there really is a Shadow Inventory, please, please, please release them onto the market!”

Even with all of the good news, there are a few concerns that could cause turmoil in the real estate market in 2013.  One of those concerns is the extension to the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.  This Act is to expire on December 31, 2012 and at this point it does not look as if it will be extended this year.   The purpose of the Act is to prevent families who hold distressed properties from facing a hefty tax bill for trying to modify their mortgage or to seek a short sale through their lender. Even those facing foreclosure could find themselves forced to pay a “foreclosure tax” if Congress doesn’t act.

“If Congress does extend the law for federal income taxes, California is poised to follow suit for state taxes,” said Alex Creel, senior vice president of governmental affairs at the California Association of Realtors.    "Clearly nothing will happen on the extension this year," he said. Even if Congress waits until well into 2013 or even 2014 to extend the bill, it could easily make the bill retroactive to Jan. 1, 2013, so no one would be left out in the cold.  Admittedly that would put people in an awkward spot if they're trying to do transactions in 2013 and Congress hasn't acted," he said. "They would be out there wondering if the extender would go through."
The National Association of Realtors has a campaign to rally Realtors regarding this issue.  If you would like to have your voice heard regarding this issue, go to their website at www.realtor.org
The other concern is in regards to the Mortgage Interest Deduction (MID).  There is a possibility that this deduction may be totally removed as a write-off or else it may be modified.  Many pundits doubt that it will be totally removed.   In regards to modifying, some of the more popular proposals include eliminating the deduction entirely for second homes; converting the present MID to a 12 percent tax credit; reducing the $1 million ceiling to $500,000; and dropping the deduction in favor of lower tax rates.  There is still a possibility that it will not be modified at all.
Progress has been made in bringing stability to the housing market.  Any changes to the MID could place the housing market and the broader economy under stress and destroy wealth accumulation that is the foundation for a healthy middle class. 

Our market is doing well and buyers are out in full force.  With such a robust market, whether you are a buyer or a seller, you would be wise to enlist the aid of a knowledgeable Realtor to help you through the process.   Let’s think positively that the Mortgage Forgiveness Act gets extended and, if there are modifications to the MID, it does not adversely affect most homeowners.   




Monday, December 3, 2012

The 15 Best Housing Markets for the Next Five Years

Yahoo! Finance/Thinkstock - Santa Barbara, California

National home prices are expected to climb 0.3 percent in the next year, according to the latest home price report by Fiserv Case-Shiller. But over the next five years, home prices are projected to rise 3.3 percent.

We drew on Fiserv Case-Shiller data to identify the best housing markets for the next five years. The top 15 cities are ranked by the projected annualized change in home prices between Q2 2012 and Q2 2017. We also included the median home price, median household income, unemployment rate, and the change in home prices since their peak to offer a broader view of the local economy and housing market.

Note: The median family income is for Q1 2012, home price data is for Q2 2012. Unemployment data is as of August 2012, and population data is for 2011.


Glens Falls, New York
Google MapsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.7 percent

Home prices have declined 7.8 percent in Glen Falls since they peaked in Q4 2008. The median home price is $159,000 which is lower than the national median of $181,000.
Glen Falls has a population of 128,996, an unemployment rate of 9.1 percent, and a median family income of $64,300.

Yuma, Arizona
Google MapsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.7 percent

Home prices have fallen 37.1 percent in Yuma since their Q4 2006 peak.

It has a population of 200,870, an unemployment rate of 25.8 percent, and a median family income of $45,400, lower than the national median of $62,900.


Eugene-Springfield, Oregon

Wikimedia Commons
Annualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.7 percent

Eugene-Springfield home prices have decreased 22.9 percent since their Q2 2007 peak. The metro has a population of 353,416, an unemployment rate of 8.8 percent, and a median family income of $53,200.





Yakima, Washington

Wikimedia CommonsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.8 percent

Home prices in Yakima are down 8.1 percent since their Q1 2009 peak. It has a median home price of $168,800.

Yakima also has a population of 247,141, an unemployment rate of 10.2 percent, and a median family income of $47,800.



Brunswick, Georgia

Wikimedia CommonsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.9 percent

Home prices in Brunswick have tumbled 32.3 percent since their Q4 2007 peak.

It has a population of 112,923, an unemployment rate of 10.4 percent, and a median family income of $50,500, that is below the national median.



Tucson, Arizona

Byways.orgAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 7.9 percent

Tucson's home prices have plunged 42.6 percent since their Q1 2006 peak, and it has median home price of $153,000.

It also has a population of 989,569, a median family income of $57,400, and an unemployment rate of 7.5 percent.



Gulfport-Biloxi, Mississippi

Ed Schipul / FlickrAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.0 percent

Home prices in the Gulfport-Biloxi metro area have slipped 20.4 percent since their Q4 2007 peak, and the metro has a median home price of $101,000.  It has a population of 253,511, an unemployment rate of 8.4 percent and a median household income of $52,700.




Napa, California
Google MapsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.0 percent

Home prices in Napa have plunged 50.1 percent since they peaked in Q1 2006, and the city has a median home price of $342,000.
Napa has a population of 138,088, an unemployment rate of 8.1 percent, and a median family income of $77,700 above the national median.


Ocala, Florida
Annualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.0 percent
Home prices in Ocala are down 49.1 percent from their Q3 2006 peak.  But Ocala has a high unemployment rate of 10.1 percent, a median family income of $44,600, well below the national median of $62,900, and a median home price of $105,000.


Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, California
Wikimedia CommonsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.4 percent

The Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta metro area has a population of 426,878, a median family income of $69,000, and an unemployment rate of 8.1 percent.  Home prices are down 52 percent from their Q3 2006 peak, and the metro has a median home price of $290,000.


Sebastian-Vero Beach, Florida

Google MapsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.7 percent

Sebastian-Vero Beach home prices have fallen 50.9 percent since their Q4 2005 peak.

The metro has an unemployment rate of 10.6 percent, and a median family income of $58,600, while the median cost of a home is $150,000.



Madera-Chowchilla, California

Google MapsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.8 percent

Home prices in the Madera-Chowchilla metro area have fallen 54 percent since their peak in the third quarter of 2006.  At 14.2 percent, the unemployment rate is much higher than the national average of 8.1. The metro has a population of 152,925 and a low median family income of $52,700.



Santa Fe, New Mexico

Wikimedia CommonsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 8.9 percent

Santa Fe's home prices have fallen 21.7 percent from their Q4 2007 peak. The city has a population of 145,648, an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent below the national average, and a median household income of $59,600, below the national median of $62,900.




Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, Florida
Wikimedia CommonsAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 9.5 percent

Home prices in the Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach metro area have fallen 45.3 percent since their Q1 2006 peak. It now has a median home price of $137,000.  The metro has a population of 169,856, an unemployment rate of 8.8 percent, and a median family income of $56,300.


Medford, Oregon

Bailey Weaver / FlickrAnnualized expected growth from 2012 - 2017: 11.2 percent

Medford's home prices have fallen 39.8 percent since their peak in Q2 2006. The metro has a population of 204,822 and median family income of $49,600.

At 10.8 percent Medford's unemployment rate is higher than the national average.



Data provided by Fiserv Case-Shiller Indexes

Pagination



Pagination